Part 1 Questions
1. In simple terms I'd count as an Atheist who would rank a 6.9 on Richard Dawkins Agnostic Scale.
2. The very nature of being an atheist is being without a God. So no, I don't have one.
3. Bluntly speaking? We decompose into the ground and become worm food, though this get's delayed with practices like Cyronics or donating your body to Science. More ideologically speaking?
4.
Myself None
5. Militant and Anti-Theism. Note that I said "Theism" and not "Theist". I don't have issues with other individuals who are religious, but I take issues with Religions themselves as a structure of beliefs. Which to cut a long story short (for now, I'm expecting later questions to bring this up) I find it's done more harm to humanity than good.
6. I adapt to the evidence that the Scientific Method has provided us, so in essence I'm Agnostic in that I'm open to being proven wrong should the proper evidence be provided. But in practice there's such little evidence to suggest that any God exists (let alone a specific religions version of God) that I can say with almost perfect certainty that there is no God.
7. Like I said in the sixth question, I adapt to the evidence. So if we were to discover new evidence suggesting something different I would first examine it over to confirm it is in fact proper evidence, and then if it were I would adapt accordingly.
8. For the first 14 years of my life I was a Casual Christian. The kind who would say God and Jesus exists, make the occasional prayer when something big was happening, but otherwise it wouldn't be a factor in my life. But then one of my Grandparents died, one who was strongly Catholic. This got me thinking about the afterlife, and made me decide I should dig deeper into Christianity, learn more about it and become a better Christian. This digging and searching then proceeded to last over the next 2 years of my life, where I started getting highly absorbed into my Christianity and becoming rather Fundamentalist and Extreme for a time. But eventually something sparked, I started notice inconsistencies, faults in reasoning, weak evidence etc. popping up whenever Religion would be debated. So by the time I was 16 I realised there really wasn't any case for their being a God, so I started calling myself Agnostic (even though Agnostic is something different from if one's religious or not), and it wasn't until I was 17 I gained the courage to just come out with being an Atheist, and I have remained an Atheist ever since (which so far, has been 5 years).
9. My Sister's an Atheist, but she also believes in a ton of supernatural stuff, mainly ghosts and spirits, so although we both lack having an actual religion we follow very different paths still when it comes to beliefs of the world, scepticism etc.
10. To my knowledge the majority of my family are still casual Christians, that being said it's never been much a talking point in the family so others may of also become Atheists and I just haven't heard of it. And then there's a small handful of family members who are Jewish, but are also casual.
11. Like I said above, it's not a topic that tends to even come up. That being said though, I used to have most of them on Facebook* where I was very open about my Atheism, so it's probably safe to assume they all know I'm an atheist. And really there's been no change in interactions between us (at least where I can pinpoint Religion as being the cause). The closest I get to any kind of reaction of Mom occasionaly proclaiming "I'll pray for you! I believe!"... But she does the same thing when it comes to Santa, so.
*One side eventually got removed. But it wasn't due to Religion but due to differences when it came to PC Culture, and how they were constantly trying to punish me IRL through my Mom that made me decide (after repeated attempts to get them to air their grievances to me directly) to remove them*
12. I don't ever go out of my way to make people Atheists, no. But it's not a topic that I shy away from it comes to debate either. That being said, I don't think there *is* a topic that I shy away from.
13. No, that would be called being an asshole.
14. In most cases not really, as long as the persons religious views doesn't interfere with their ability to be open-minded, and/or make them easily offended at certain jokes or styles of humour. However, when it comes to trying to find a life partner there is a concern about how a religious difference might influence how we try to raise our children, and if it would cause a conflict in the household. Cause I personally plan to raise my children to be free and critical thinkers, not to take claims at face value and to question authority, question the evidence and to dig into the matters for themselves. That could be at odds with someone who intends to sit the kids down and teach them about the glory of Jesus Christ as if it's undisputed fact.
15. I do not have a belief in any God or Religion. Anything beyond that wouldn't be due to being an Atheist but due to my Skeptical approach to matters.
Part 2 Questions
1. Well there's no real "sect" or branch specifically for me to address. But in general most atheists are just your everyday people, it's just that while most people don't believe in 2,999 Gods, they just take it one God further. However, there are the extremists, where you've got people trying to demonzie anyone's whose religious and treat it like some sort of mental illness. These people don't really seemed to of actually but much thought into the matter, and are just looking for an excuse to be ass holes towards others. And then you got groups like Atheism+ who just get's offended by EVERYTHING! But, this is more of a political issue than a (non)religious issue.
2. I'm fine with most religious people, but when it comes to Religions themselves as a set of beliefs or Ideology I dislike pretty much all of them. Mainly because I find them to be the most rampant and successful case of false information that Humanity has ever had. You've got organisations of millions (and sometimes billions) of people all united over believing something that Science has already disproved, and then using that as a platform to continually argue against Science. A belief in that one of the best sources of moral values isn't through self evaluation or looking into Psychology, but based on what one specific book says. A belief that has been used time and time again to justify great acts of violence and cruelty onto others. A belief that cause families to be divided, and people to be shunned for either a difference of opinion or who they happen to be attracted to. A belief that routinely takes time and money away from people who are often struggling the most and really need to be keeping it so that they can look after themselves. I will grant that it has contributed to some works of art, and as a refuge and a (fragile) community for some people, but those benefits can often be found other ways, and I just don't think those benefits are worth the cost.
3. I don't pay attention to the current leaders well enough to say much here. But I do appreciate it when the current Pope tries to encourage Christians to makes bridges instead of walls, and to be more accepting of your fellow man.
4. At their best they're using flawed arguments, reasoning and evidence. At their worse they're emotionally manipulative (or if you look at the VERY extreme, violent).
5. I've read a few books in the Bible during my 2 years of questioning, and I looked over some lines in the Quaran over time. I'm not a fan, at the best of times they're pushing conceptions that are outdated and unproven (or just really awkward, like a decorators guide), and at the worst of times they're calls for Crusades and Jihads.
6. I've already touched on these people throughout the other questions, so in a nutshell they are messed up individuals who are seriously damaging to society.
7. Make Praising the Sun in true Dark Souls manner an actual thing.
8. I've basically answered this in #2 already, so to skip to the overall part I think they are overall bad for society to have. The people within the religions are often good people, but the system of beliefs themselves don't hold any practical use for people and have consistently been used to slow progress or damage people's lives, most often the lives of their own believers.
9. This seems like the exact same question as #8, is there something I'm missing here? :/
10. It's the content of one's character that truly defines if one is good or not, not what religion (or lack of religion) that fall under. That being said, due to all the criticisms I've made of Religion about I do find it beneficial for people to be without a religion, and due to the independence and freedom being without one grants it does make it easier for them to grow into being a good person, but it is by no means required.
11. Not really, these questions seemed to of covered pretty much anything I could think of.[/S]