"This is very true, I agree, and I think we can both agree that no matter how much a person may try not to show it, every author of said primary sources has a bias of some sort," she said calmly. "After all, look at the [hang on, need to find name spelling]! Both of which claim to be first hand accounts of the [starts with an M], but are very different from each other. Personal experiences and expectations can highly color the lens through which you write or read, would you not agree? And we all have certain sensitivities from our own perceptions of the world. It is unavoidable. Not to mention, these are blog posts. They are completely unverifiable. Even if they are intended only as a snapshot of the life of someone living in a certain situation, how can someone prove that they are what they say they are? Especially in this day of AI Generation. Do you remember that massive problem with 'Amish Life Hacks' on YouTube back in '26? Terrible things. Even before AI, people pretending to be or suffer from things that did not exist was not exactly unheard of."